[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
A legal factsheet about pets in strata schemes
From Strata Service NSW
ย
Can I keepย aย pet in a strata scheme?ย
The by-laws of each strata scheme should explain how an owner or occupier can keep a pet. By-laws that place a blanket ban on keeping pets no longer have any effect and cannot be relied on by anย ownersย corporation.ย
Broadly speaking, owners and occupiers can keep a pet with permission of their owners corporation.ย
However,ย tenants mustย also look at their tenancy agreement. Landlords are still allowed to refuseย pets, even if the strata scheme allows for them.ย If a tenant has a pet without their landlordโs permission, they may be in breach of their tenancy agreement.ย
ย
Can I keep an assistance animalย (like a guide dog)ย in a strata scheme?ย
Neitherย ownersย corporations orย landlordsย cannot prohibit the keeping of an assistance animal in a lot.ย Theyย can ask for evidence such as an assistance animal permit.ย
ย
Can theย ownersย corporation have an approval process?ย ย
Anย ownersย corporation can requireย the completion of aย pet approval processย beforeย they give theirย permissionย to allow a pet. However, there are limits.ย If they require approvalย they must:ย
- only refuse permission for aย petย on the basis thatย itย causes an unreasonable interference to another occupant, andย
- make their decision about theย petย within a reasonable timeframe.ย
It is arguable thatย aย pet is automatically approved if anย ownersย corporation does not make its decision in accordance with these rules.ย
Can theย ownersย corporation refuseย my pet?ย
Theย ownersย corporation can only prohibitย petsย ifย theyย interfere with another occupantโs use and enjoyment of theirย lot or the common property.ย Aย by-law or a decision under a by-law has no force or effectย to the extent that it would unreasonably prohibitย keepingย aย pet.ย
Theย ownersย corporation cannot place a banket ban onย petsย in their by-laws, nor can they replace a blanket ban with another equallyย restrictiveย by-law or application process.ย However, aย by-law that prohibitsย petsย is not harsh, unconscionable or oppressive if it does not unreasonably prohibitย pets in theย lot.ย
ย
When can I assume the owners corporation have given their permission for me to have a pet?
Anย ownersย corporation is taken to have given permission for the keepingย pets in a lot if:ย
- theyย made a decisionย about keepingย the petย that involved unreasonable prohibition,ย orย
- theyย failed toย decideย on whether to allow the petย within a reasonable time.ย
Note: โreasonable timeโ is undefined in the new provisions so watch this space.ย
ย
What are the circumstancesย in which keepingย a petย unreasonably interferes with another occupantโs use and enjoyment of that occupantโs lot or the common property?ย
The newย regulations set outย theseย circumstances. Some examples include but are not limited to:ย ย
- theย petย makes a noise that persistently occurs to the degree that the noise unreasonably interferes with the peace, comfort or convenience of another occupant, orย ย
- theย petย repeatedly runs at or chases another occupant, a visitor of another occupant or an animal kept by another occupant, orย
- theย petย attacks or otherwise menaces another occupant, a visitor of another occupant orย anย petย kept by another occupant, orย
- theย petย repeatedly causes damage to the common property or another lot, orย
- theย petย endangers the health of another occupant through infection or infestation, orย
- theย petย causes a persistent offensive odour that penetrates another lot or the common property.ย
ย
What approach has the Tribunal taken?ย
Sinceย Cooper v The Owners โ Strata Plan No. 58068ย [2020] NSWCA 250,ย the Tribunal has adopted a very narrow approach towards the keepingย petsย in strata schemes. For instance, inย Roden v The Owners โ Strata Plan No. 55773ย [2021] NSWCATCD 61,ย Mr Roden sought to invalidate parts of theย petsย by-laws in his strata schemeย – particularly a $300 application fee as a condition of allowing a pet.ย The Tribunal rejected Mr Rodenโs application stating that a condition or by-law that is โreasonableโ was not capable of being harsh, oppressive,ย or unconscionableย and on that basis was a valid by-law. It will be interesting to see if the Tribunal continues to adopt thisย narrow approach.ย
ย
What are some issues with theย new provisions?ย
An interpretation issue with the newย regulationsย isย that the circumstances listed contemplate that theย petย is already on the lot. Arguably, this could mean that the owners corporation must allow theย petย on the lot unless and until it unreasonably interferes with another occupant’s use and enjoyment of their lot or common property. We expect someย ownersย corporations to attempt to prohibit animals on an anticipation basis.โฏย
The wording ofย the newย regulation suggests it is an exhaustive list, meaning anything not listed would not be deemed a circumstance of unreasonable interference.ย For instance, personal preferences, fears or allergies shouldย arguablyย not be taken intoย consideration andย will likely cause controversy in the future.
The circumstances listed underย theย regulationsย are subjective and need to be considered on a case-by-case basis. It is very dependent on the mindset of theย ownersย corporation and the sentiment of the other lot owners.ย
ย
Canย Iย bringย aย pet on to the lot ifย Iย have good grounds to argue that there has been an unreasonable refusal by anย ownersย corporation?ย
Yes, but this comes with some risk on the part of the occupant as theย ownersย corporationย mayย decideย to take action.ย ย
Anย ownersย corporationย may issue a notice to complyย with by-lawsย and if the lot owner fails to comply (by removing theย pet), the owners corporation canย try andย seek an ordersย from theย New South Wales Civil and Administrativeย Tribunalย (โthe Tribunalโ)ย to remove theย pet.ย Anย ownersย corporation can alsoย askย the Tribunalย to imposeย monetary penaltyย of up to $1,100 at first instanceย for breaching a by-law.ย ย
ย
What options doย Iย have in response?ย ย
Owners and occupiersย can defend the proceedings by making their own application to the Tribunal for an orderย asking for permission to keepย theย pet. A tenant needs the written consent of their landlord to lodge this application.ย ย
Alternatively, an owner or occupier can commence proceedings as soon as approval is not given and before they bring a pet into the lot, rather than wait for the owners corporation to enforce the by-law. Mediation at NSW Fair Trading should be attempted before an application is made to the Tribunal.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_separator][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
This resource is intended as a guide to the law and should not be used as a substitute for legal advice. It applies to people who live in, or are affected by, the law as it applies in New South Wales, Australia and is subject to change.
The legal information contained on this page is current as at 22 October 2021.
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]